Genetic Strategies for Schizophrenia

European Psychiatric Review, 2010;3(1):30-34

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a complex multifactorial and polygenic disease with an overall heritability of 63–85%. Taking into account the low correlations between genotype and phenotype and considering the difficulties encountered with linkage analyses in complex diseases, several teams have chosen alternative strategies to identify candidate genes, such as the endophenotype strategy or the study of chromosomal aberrations associated with psychotic symptoms. The genes identified so far from both traditional mapping, copy number variation (CNV) analysis and other strategies point to several biological pathways: the integrity of the synapse (neurexin 1, neurogranin, etc); the wnt/GSK3 signalling pathway (DISC1, TCF4, etc.) and GRIK4 or NPAS3, which are involved in functions such as neurogenesis in the brain; glutamatergic signalling (NRG1, DTNBP1, PRODH, D-amino acid oxidase activator, etc); the dopaminergic system (COMT, DRD3, etc); and the major histocompatibility complex. These findings are consistent with current developmental and biological hypotheses about psychosis. Genetic studies should also consider the potential for interactions between multiple loci at the same or at different genes (epistasis) or for epigenetics (DNA and chromatin modifications that play a critical role in regulation of various genomic functions) and, finally, for gene–environment interactions.
Keywords
Genetics, schizophrenia, endophenotypes, chromosomal abnormalities, linkage studies, association studies
Disclosure The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Received: August 31, 2009 Accepted December 14, 2009
Correspondence: Florence Thibaut, Psychiatry Department, University Hospital Nicolle, 1 rue de Germont 76031, Rouen, France. E: Florence.Thibaut@chu-rouen.fr

Schizophrenia is a complex multifactorial and polygenic disease. Although family, twin and adoption studies have consistently suggested that genetic factors play an important aetiological role in schizophrenia, until now very little has been known about the nature and number of these genetic factors. The overall heritability of the disease is 63–85%. In this article we will review the limitations of the traditional methods used in the search for genetic risk factors and discuss alternative strategies.

Linkage Studies – Limitations

Linkage analysis, which seeks to localise a chromosomal region associated with the transmission of a disease within families, and ultimately the responsible gene, may be very difficult in multifactorial diseases such as schizophrenia. During recent years, numerous linkage claims have been made with moderate logarithm of the odds (Lod) scores. In many cases in which an attempt has been made to replicate the linkage claim, the original positive finding has not been replicated. Linkage analysis in schizophrenia is problematic for several reasons: uncertainty about clinical status in relatives; genetic heterogeneity may be substantial; penetrance of susceptibility genotypes may be incomplete (by interacting with the environment, the genotype [either biological or psychosocial] produces a clinical phenotype meeting the diagnostic criteria for the disorder, a subclinical phenotype or a symptom-free phenotype); phenocopies are subjects who may meet the diagnostic criteria but do not have the genotype of the disorder; misspecification of the genetic model may strongly affect the results of multipoint linkage; and there are few large families with multiple affected individuals (structural variants that cause schizophrenia may also abolish fertility and decrease the number of Mendelian families).1

Although sibling pairs linkage studies avoid some of the problems encountered in family-based linkage analysis, such as the estimation of penetrance, the method has its own limitations and is most powerful under conditions of moderate genetic heterogeneity. Then, a large number of families has to be studied before a reliable linkage finding can be obtained and replicated.

References:
  1. Gershon ES, Cloninger RC, Genetic approaches to mental disorders, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1994.
  2. Cichon S, Craddock N, Daly M, et al., Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Coordinating Committee, Genomewide association studies: history, rationale and prospects for psychiatric disorders, Am J Psychiatry, 2009;166:540–56.
  3. Ioannidis JP, Gwinn M, Little J, et al., A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology, Nat Genet, 2006;38:3–5.
  4. DeLisi LE, Faraone SV, When is a ‘positive’ association truly a ‘positive’ in psychiatric genetics?, Am J Med Genet, 2006;141B:319–22.
  5. Sullivan PF, Owe MJ, O’Donovan MC, et al. In: Lieberman JA, Strop TS, Perkins DO (eds), The American psychiatric publishing textbook of schizophrenia, Washington DC: American Psychiatry Publishing Inc, 2006;39–54.
  6. Harrison PJ, Law AJ, Neuregulin 1 and schizophrenia: genetics, gene expression, and neurobiology, Biol Psychiatry, 2006;60:132–40.
  7. International Schizophrenia Consortium, Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia, Nature, 2008;455(7210):237–41.
  8. Stefansson H, Rujescu D, Cichon S, et al., Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia, Nature, 2008;455(7210):232–6.
  9. Freedman R, Coon H, Myles-Worsley M, et al., Linkage of a neurophysiological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1997;94(2): 587–92.
  10. Purcell SM, Wray NR, Stone JL, et al., International Schizophrenia Consortium, Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, Nature, 2009;460(7256):748–52.
  11. Stefansson H, Ophoff RA, Steinberg S, et al., Common variants conferring risk of schizophrenia, Nature, 2009;460(7256):744–7.
  12. Shi J, Levinson DF, Duan J, et al., Common variants on chromosome 6p22.1 are associated with schizophrenia, Nature, 2009;460(7256):753–7.
  13. Gottesman II, Gould TD, The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions, Am J Psychiatry, 2003;160:636–45.
  14. Louchart-de la Chapelle S, Nkam I, Houy E, et al., A concordance study of three electrophysiological measures in schizophrenia, Am J Psychiatry, 2005;162:466–74.
  15. Allen AJ, Griss ME, Folley BS, et al., Endophenotypes in schizophrenia: a selective review, Schizophrenia Res, 2009;109:24–37.
  16. Raux G, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Thibaut F, et al., The-2 bp deletion in exon 6 of the “alpha 7-like” nicotinic receptor subunit gene is a risk factor for the P50 sensory gating deficit, Mol Psychiatry, 2002;7(9):1006–11.
  17. Leonard S, Freedman R, Genetics of chromosome 15q13- q14 in schizophrenia, Biol Psychiatry, 2006;60:115–22.
  18. Flint J, Munafò MR, The endophenotype concept in psychiatric genetics, Psychol Med, 2007;37(2):163–80.
  19. Porteous DJ, Thomson P, Brandon NJ, The genetics and biology of Disc1. An emerging role in psychosis and cognition, Biol Psychiatry, 2006;60:123–31.
  20. Pickard BS, Malloy MP, Porteous DJ, et al., Disruption of a brain transcription factor NPAS3 is associated with schizophrenia and learning disability, Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 2005;136(1):26–32.
  21. Pickard BS, Malloy MP, Christoforou A, et al., Cytogenetic and genetic evidence supports a role for the kainatetype glutamate receptor gene, GRIK4, in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, Mol Psychiatry, 2006;11(9):847–57.
  22. Blackwood DHR, Thiagarajah T, Malloy B, et al., Chromosome abnormalities, mental retardation, and the search for genes in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, Neurotoxicity Res, 2008;14(2–3):113–20.
  23. Pieper AA, Wu X, Han TW, et al., The neuronal domain PAS protein 3 transcription factor controls FGF-mediated adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005;102(39):14052–7.
  24. Jacquet H, Berthelot J, Bonnemains C, et al., The severe form of type I hyperprolinaemia results from homozygous inactivation of the PRODH gene, J Med Genet, 2003;40(1):e7.
  25. Jacquet H, Demily C, Houy E, et al., Hyperprolinemia is a risk factor for schizoaffective disorder, Mol Psychiatry, 2005;10:479–85.
  26. Liu H, Heath SC, Sobin C, et al., Genetic variation at the 22q11 PRODH2/DGCR6 locus presents an unusual pattern and increases susceptibility to schizophrenia, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002;99:3717–22.
  27. Raux G, Bumsel E, Hecketsweiler B, et al., Involvement of hyperprolinemia in cognitive and psychiatric features of the 22q11 deletion syndrome, Hum Mol Genetics, 2007;16(1):83–91
  28. Paterlini M, Zakharenko SS, Lai WS, et al., Transcriptional and behavioural interaction between 22q11.2 orthologs modulates schizophrenia-related phenotypes in mice, Nat Neurosci, 2005;8(11):1586–94.
  29. Tunbridge EM, Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR, Catechol-OMethyltransferase, cognition, and psychosis : Val 158 Met and beyond, Biol Psychiatry, 2006;60:141–51.
  30. Wong AH, Gottesman II, Petronis A, Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic perspective, Hum Mol Genet, 2005;14:R11–18.
  31. Abkarian S, Sung-Huang H, Epigenetic regulation in human brain-focus on histone lysine methylation, Biol Psychiatry, 2009;65:198–203.
  32. Fatemi HS, Folsom TD, The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia revisited, Schizophrenia Bull, 2009;35(3):528–48.
  33. Mirnics K, Levitt P, Lewis DA, Critical appraisal of DNA microarrays in psychiatric genomics, Biol Psychiatry, 2005;60:163–76.
  34. Perkins DO, Jeffries C, Sullivan P, Expanding the ‘central dogma’: the regulatory role of non protein coding genes and implications for the genetic liability to schizophrenia, Mol Psychiatry, 2005;10(1):69–78.
  35. Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Cannon M, et al., Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the Catechol- O-Methyltransferase gene: longitudinal evidence of a gene x environment interaction, Biol Psychiatry, 2005;57: 1117–27.